From 591c174235013218b8c80503b530f06f4f76d290 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Parker Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:08:30 -0600 Subject: Remove footgun doc comment in miner TX validation This comment suggests this check is unnecessary, when it is completely necessary as miner TXs can have multiple outputs *which is a statement directly, and incorrectly, contradicted by this comment*. While I don't ever see someone removing this code and getting their edits merged into Monero, someone inexperienced who thinks they're cleaning old code may break their own work, and then there's really just zero benefit to keeping this around. --- src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp b/src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp index 34031fb7c..4ac849bc2 100644 --- a/src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp +++ b/src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp @@ -1363,9 +1363,6 @@ bool Blockchain::prevalidate_miner_transaction(const block& b, uint64_t height, CHECK_AND_ASSERT_MES(b.miner_tx.unlock_time == height + CRYPTONOTE_MINED_MONEY_UNLOCK_WINDOW, false, "coinbase transaction transaction has the wrong unlock time=" << b.miner_tx.unlock_time << ", expected " << height + CRYPTONOTE_MINED_MONEY_UNLOCK_WINDOW); //check outs overflow - //NOTE: not entirely sure this is necessary, given that this function is - // designed simply to make sure the total amount for a transaction - // does not overflow a uint64_t, and this transaction *is* a uint64_t... if(!check_outs_overflow(b.miner_tx)) { MERROR("miner transaction has money overflow in block " << get_block_hash(b)); -- cgit v1.2.3